|
Overview:
Why do espionage movies appeal to us? Is it because of the
cool gadgets, the beautiful women, or the twisting storylines?
I suppose it’s all of those rolled into one. Some audiences
like the campiness of spy movies like James Bond, while others
like the covert underhanded world of secret agents.
Nevertheless, The Recruit is another one of those films.
Although I enjoyed Colin Farrell’s acting along side the famed
acting skills of Al Pacino the movie lacked a certain
something to make it a masterpiece.
Review:
Set in the Washington and Virginia area, The Recruit focuses
on CIA hopeful James Clayton (Colin Farrell), a computer
genius on the verge of making a huge salary with
his new
broadcasting software. James has become obsessed with the loss
of his father in South America while working for a major oil
company. As Clayton is working at a local bar, a haggard
looking Al Pacino claims that he is CIA material. Walter Burke
(Al Pacino) wants Clayton to try the CIA entry exam to see if
he is any good. Unsurprisingly, Clayton blows everyone else
out of the water. He is resourceful, creative, and very
intelligent. What do you expect, he’s the main character!
As the CIA agents are evaluated at a remote location called The
Farm, they are constantly tested and retested to resist their
weaknesses. The tests continue while the recruits are pushed
to their limits. Colin meets the archetypal ‘hot spy female’ in Layla
Moore (Bridget Moynahan). Yes there is a bad joke alluding to
Eric Clapton’s song (Why Roger Donaldson, why?). As Clayton’s
and Moore’s stifled love becomes more and more evident Walter
uses it to teach James the same vital lesson: “Do not get
caught,” plain and simple right? At the end of their training
Clayton is chosen to be the Black Ops specialist. He is the
one who works behind enemy lines and if caught, will be denied
any affiliation with the US and CIA. As his first test,
Clayton must determine weather or not there is a mole in the
CIA. Tensions mount as a game of cat and mouse is played
out with
the characters. Unfortunately, the character interaction is
about the best thing in this movie. The stress between Colin
Farrell, Bridget Moynahan, and Al Pacino provides well fleshed
out characters that the audience can understand.
I enjoyed how the film carries the “trust no one” adage
throughout. The Recruit kept dancing around with the
aspect of who was working for whom, and what side they are all
on. I feel that although, a shifty plot is interesting, The
Recruit relies on it too heavily. As far as the rest of the
script, it lacked something special. Perhaps it could be the
worn style and configuration of the film or the lackluster
ending. The Recruit is a film that requires a low level of
thought process; just enough to follow what is going on.
Movies like this aren’t a bad thing but in a society where
there are lots of movies that are just fluff, they drag others
down.
Acting:
Colin Farrell continues to work on his acting skills, but
regrettably he takes a step back with The Recruit. He first
grabbed my attention in Minority Report with his excellent
rendering of a futuristic Washington D.C detective. However,
with the release of The Recruit and Daredevil, I fear he may
be travelling away from the path of reputable movies. Al Pacino
looks as horrible as ever. Even though his role is a bit tame
he looks incredibly tired. Bridget Moynahan has been in a few
other movies including Sum of All Fears and Coyote Ugly, but
nothing with this much acting. It’s too bad, because she is a
decent actress and good looking to boot. The interaction
between these three makes the movie more enjoyable. Colin
Farrell is an emerging actor but needs to watch what movies he
is in.
Directing:
Roger Donaldson did a respectable job at filming The Recruit
but forgot something to designate the movie
as popular. What is
it about certain movies that lack that extra push to make it
good? Is it plot, acting, marketing, or how the director
portrays the story onto film? Whatever it is, The Recruit
doesn’t have it. The cinematography was admirable; using
uncommon camera angles and good editing techniques. Roger made
a middle of the road movie, for a lull in movie release dates.
Final Thoughts:
Although I enjoyed watching The Recruit, I see it as a fluff
movie. You don’t have to analyze underlying themes or tones to
understand it. It is a film that celebrates the sheer fact
that movies exist. The Recruit does not need to be examined
like other films, it just needs to be watched and enjoyed on a
Saturday night. I give The Recruit three planets. It had good
character interaction, editing, and an average storyline. I
suggest waiting for the matinee or the DVD.
Jameson
Rating: 3 out of 5 Planets
Talk about
The Recruit>>
|